Characteristics Of A Good Thesis In A Compare-And-Contrast Essay

TIP Sheet

A compare and contrast essay examines two or more topics (objects, people, or ideas, for example), comparing their similarities and contrasting their differences. You may choose to focus exclusively on comparing, exclusively on contrasting, or on both-or your instructor may direct you to do one or both.

First, pick useable subjects and list their characteristics. In fact, their individual characteristics determine whether the subjects are useable. After that, choose a parallel pattern of organization and effective transitions to set your paper above the merely average.

1. Picking a subject
Focus on things that can obviously be compared or contrasted. For instance, if you are examining an idea (political or philosophical) examine the opposite of that idea. Or, if you are examining a person, like a president, pick another president for comparison or contrast. Don't try to compare a president and a cab driver, or existentialism and a legislative bill on car tax refunds.

2. Listing characteristics
Divide a piece of paper into two sides. One side is for the first subject, the other for the second subject. Then, begin to list the similarities and differences that immediately come to mind. Concentrate on characteristics that either are shared or are opposing between the two subjects. Alternately, you may construct a Venn diagram of intersecting circles, listing the subjects' differences to either side and their similarities where the circles intersect. Keep in mind that for a balanced paper, you want to make point-by-point, parallel comparisons (or contrasts).

Similarities between my math and English instructors:
Both are welcoming and available to students.
Both are organized and keep a neat office.
Both are knowledgeable and professional.


Differences between my math and English instructors
Math teacher listens to classic rock.         English teacher listens to jazz.
Math teacher drinks Earl Grey tea.           English teacher drinks strong black coffee.
Math teacher likes to chat about movies.  English teacher sticks to business.

As you create your list, is it clear why you are comparing and contrasting these two subjects? Do you have a preference for one or the other? If so, make sure you are evaluating each side fairly. A point-by-point list helps you maintain balance.

Once you have a list, decide whether there are more similarities or differences between the topics. If there are more similarities, concentrate your paper on comparing. If there are more differences (or if, as in the example above, the differences are simply more interesting), concentrate on contrasting. If there is a balance of similarities and differences, you might concentrate on discussing this balance.

3. Organizing
There are at least two ways to organize a compare/contrast essay. Imagine you are examining Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant, both Civil War generals. In your list you have uncovered important points of dissimilarity between them. Those points are their background, personalities, and underlying aspirations. (Call these three points A, B, and C.) You have decided to contrast the two subjects.

Here is one way to organize the body of this paper, addressing points A, B, and C for each subject. This paper will follow parallel order–A, B, and then C–for each subject:

A. Lee's background
B. Lee's personality
C. Lee's underlying aspirations

A. Grant's background
B. Grant's personality
C. Grant's underlying aspirations

However, here is another way to organize the same paper:

A. Lee's background
A. Grant's background

B. Lee's personality
B. Grant's personality

C. Lee's underlying aspiration
C. Grant's underlying aspiration

For a shorter paper, the above might represent three paragraphs; if you are writing a long paper and have a great deal of information, you may choose to write about each point, A, B, and C, in separate paragraphs for a total of six. However you decide to organize, make sure it is clear why you are examining this subject. You might be able to compare apples and oranges, for example, but why would you? Include any insights or opinions you have gathered. And yes, in general, three is the magic number. While there is no hard-and-fast rule that precludes creating a paper based on two points, or four, or five, a three-point discussion is manageable, especially for complex or abstract subjects. At the same time, a three-point structure helps you avoid oversimplifying, especially when addressing controversial topics in which discussions tend to become polarized–right or wrong, black or white, for or against. Three-point treatments encourage discussion of the middle ground.

4. Signaling transitions
Learn to use expressions that precisely convey contrast or comparison. These expressions, or transitions, signal contrast:

  • on the contrary
  • on the other hand
  • however
  • otherwise
  • whereas
  • still
  • yet

These expressions signal comparison:

  • as well as
  • both
  • like
  • in common with
  • likewise
  • also

Signal words such as these help the reader understand the relationships between your sentences, paragraphs, and ideas. In particular, if you are both comparing and contrasting, signal words help sort out what's what. Second only to effective organization, effective use of these expressions will go a long way toward helping produce a good compare/contrast paper.

Political Science/JSIS/LSJ Writing Center

Compare/Contrast Papers

Back to Helpful HandoutsoWriting Center Home Page

Goal: To explore the similarities and differences between two texts.

To begin
Think about the arguments and evidence presented in each text. Try to identify each author's thesis statement.

Thesis Statement
The thesis statement of a comparison/contrast paper should contain an idea or claim that unites a discussion of the texts. The thesis statement should also include the argument that will be advanced in support of the claim that is being made.

Methods of Organization
Organization is critical to a Compare/Contrast paper. Because you will most likely be discussing a variety of evidence, you will have to be certain that your logic can be understood by the reader. Working from an outline might simplify your task and enable you to evaluate your own reasoning.

1st Method:

I. Introduction
A. Briefly introduce the significance of subjext matter
B. Thesis Statement
  • First supporting point
  • Second supporting point
  • Third supporting point

  • II. First work
    A. Summary of work
  • Relationship of work to first point
  • Relationship of work to second point
  • Relationship of work to third point

  • III. Second work
    (same structure)

    IV. Third work
    (same structure)

    V. Conclusion
    A. Restate thesis
    B. Summarize how you proved your argument
    2nd Method:

    I. Introduction
    A. Briefly introduce significance of subject matter
    B. Thesis statement

    II. Brief explanation of Work 1

    III. Brief explanation of Work 2

    IV. First comparative point
    A. Relation of point to 1st work
    B. Relation of point to 2nd work

    V. Second comparative point (same)

    VI. Third comparative point (same)

    VII. Conclusion
    A. Restate thesis
    B. Summarize how your proved your argument

    Let's look at a working example of the 2nd method, which is more commonly used.

    2nd method: Compare and contrast the Fascist regime created by Hitler and the Totalitarian system under Stalin, paying particular attention to their methods of creating and manipulating nationalism.

    I. Introduction
  • First work -- Hitler used parades, convention meetings and visual propaganda to unite a group of followers and create feelings of nationalism.
  • Second work -- Stalin also used visual propaganda to unite a group of followers; however, he also resorted to methods of mass terror, through purges and gulag camps, to create a feeling of Soviet nationalism.
  • Thesis statement -- In this paper I will argue that through the use of "brotherhood," charisma, education and propaganda, Hitler created stronger feelings of nationalism and loyalty among his followers than did Stalin, who relied far too much upon mass terror.

  • II. Explain the Hitler regime, specifically the key characteristics that define it as a Fascist political system.

    III. Explain the Stalin regime, specifically the key characteristics that define it as a Totalitarian political system.

    IV. First comparative point -- How each leader made use of the concept of "brotherhood"
  • Relation of point to first work
  • Relation of point to second work
  • Use specific examples from the readings and texts to support your argument

  • V. Second comparative point -- Charismatic qualities of each leader (same structure)

    VI. Third comparative point -- Use of education and propaganda (same structure)

    VII. Conclusion
  • Restate thesis
  • Brief summary of how you proved your argument

  • Back to handouts

    One thought on “Characteristics Of A Good Thesis In A Compare-And-Contrast Essay

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *